I have been reading many articles
trying to decide which one I would choose. Most of the articles didn't appeal
to me until I came across, "Senator wants scrutiny of surveillance law."
The article reads that this past Monday, Sen. Ron Wyden blocked a five-year
extension of the surveillance law. The surveillance law was used for the
government to monitor foreigner's communication with American's, through review
of e-mails and phone calls. This was originally intended for the
government to watch out for suspicious activity. Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon found out the count of how many people were being monitored,
"not reasonably possible to identify the
number of people located in the United
States whose communications may have been
reviewed." Wyden believes the government should be stopped from monitoring
calls and e-mails, unless they have a warrant or emergency authorization.
The reason I found this particular
article appealing, was the fact that I have relatives out of states that I
communicate with. It would be weird to think that the government could possibly
be hearing in on my phone calls or reading my e-mails. I don't completely agree
with this law. I like the fact that they have more awareness on the suspicious
activity that could occur. On the other hand, there are many American's that
have had their privacy invaded. Watch out the government could be monitoring
your calls or e-mails.
No comments:
Post a Comment